Home > Updates > Non-Energy Benefits/Non-Energy Impacts (NEBs/NEIs) and their role & values in cost-effectiveness tests: State of Maryland

Non-Energy Benefits/Non-Energy Impacts (NEBs/NEIs) and their role & values in cost-effectiveness tests: State of Maryland

Skumatz Non-energy benefits in California
States across the nation are reconsidering the definition and design of cost-effectiveness test procedures used in the energy efficiency regulatory arena, including the State of Maryland.

Twenty years of research and measurement of traditionally-omitted program impacts, or non-energy benefits (NEBs), have provided increasingly robust and consistent results – results that are suitable for regulators, utilities, and interveners to explore options for updating cost-effectiveness test methodologies to better inform and address potential biases in program and portfolio decision-making. The literature on NEBs now consists of more than 300 studies of various types, and more than a dozen states currently include some NEBs-related treatment in their regulatory benefit-cost testing procedures.

Author/Org: 
Lisa Skumatz, Skumatz Economic Research Associates
Year: 
2014
Categories: 
Program Design and Budgets
Tags: 
Maryland

Recent Resources

EEFA logo

The need for owners to navigate a complex landscape of clean energy and water programs greatly inhibits participation in multifamily efficiency programs nationwide.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future (SAHF) are collaborating in support of the Energy Efficiency for All (EEFA) initiative to study the existing multifamily laundry landscape and provide facts related to common-area laundry facilities in